We quote the solicitation.
If we can't point to the sentence a requirement came from, it doesn't go in your matrix. An unstated page limit stays blank rather than becoming a plausible-looking guess that costs you the submission.
For nonprofits and the people who write for them
The mission is the hard part.
The paperwork shouldn’t be.
Rubrically reads the solicitation, builds the checklist, drafts from your own words, and shows you where the points are — so your team can spend the week on the work only they can do.
Free to start · no card, no setup · your documents never train a model
| ID | Category | What it asks for | Obligation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-04 | Eligibility | 501(c)(3) with a physical office in the service area | shall | §A.1 |
| R-09 | Format | Project narrative not to exceed 12 pages, single spaced | shall | 12 pp |
| R-11 | Attachment | Current IRS determination letter | must | §D |
| R-17 | Criterion | Evaluation and sustainability plan | scored | 15 pts |
| R-18 | Deadline | Submission closes 5:00 PM local time | must | §B |
An example of the shape of the artifact. No funder, organization or award is named anywhere on this page.
In your words
Drafts are built from your documents, so the voice stays yours.
Nothing invented
If the solicitation doesn't say it, we leave it blank and ask you.
Always cited
Every requirement shows the sentence it came from.
Free to start
Reading a solicitation honestly shouldn't cost anything.
How it works
From the notice on your desk to the report you file in two years.
Six steps, one place, and the same set of true facts about your organization carrying the whole way through.
- 01
Read the notice
Upload the solicitation. Every shall, must, attachment, page limit, deadline and scored criterion becomes a row you can check off — each one carrying the sentence it came from, so you can see we didn't make it up.
- 02
See what's missing
Eligibility gates, open requirements, the attachment checklist, and where the points actually sit. It updates the moment you mark something done.
- 03
Draft in your voice
Add your past proposals and annual report once. Rubrically drafts each section from your own words — and asks you for anything it can't find, instead of guessing.
- 04
Check the score
Your draft, read against the funder's own rubric before you send it. Criterion by criterion, with the sentence from your draft that earns each one.
- 05
Hand it in
A submission-ready .docx in the order the solicitation asks for, with anything still unfinished clearly marked. Nothing quietly filled in.
- 06
Report back
When the money lands, the same fact base writes your progress reports — what you promised, against what your own data shows.
Before you send it
Find the points you were
about to leave behind.
Rubrically reads your draft the way the review panel will — against the scored criteria from that solicitation — and shows you what isn’t answered yet, while there’s still time. Every claim that something is covered quotes the sentence in your draft that covers it. It won’t invent a score, because a score it invented wouldn’t be the panel’s.
Try it on a draft →Scorecard18 of 100 still open
- Community need and alignment25
- Program design30
- Organizational capacity20
- Evaluation and sustainability15
- Budget reasonableness10
Points are the weights the solicitation published — never our estimate of them.
Our promise
We’ll never put words in your mouth.
Your name goes on this application, not ours. A number we invented would be a number you signed for — so we built the whole thing to refuse.
We quote you.
The drafter may only say something about your organization if your own documents say it first. Anything else comes back as a highlighted blank for you to fill — and a check flags any number we can't find in your files.
We tell you what we don't know.
No silent autofill, no confident filler. If something is missing you'll see exactly what and exactly where, while there's still time to do something about it.
Who it’s for
Built for the people already doing this work.
Not a replacement for the person who knows your programs. A way to give them their week back.
One-person development shops
Where the grants lead is also the events lead, and Friday's deadline is competing with everything else on the desk.
Growing development teams
A dozen funders a year, program staff who aren't writers, and a boilerplate library living in six different folders.
Consultants and grant writers
Carrying five to twenty clients, billing by the proposal, and losing hours to a blank page that a checklist could have filled.
Pricing
Reading the solicitation is free. Always.
Understanding what a funder is asking for shouldn’t be behind a paywall. Drafting, scoring and assembly are the paid part.
Free
$0 always
See what a solicitation really asks for, before you commit a week to it.
- Full requirements matrix
- Compliance and gap checklist
- Export to CSV or JSON
- 3 solicitations a month
Core
$89 per month
For a solo grants lead running a steady pipeline.
- Everything in Free
- Draft every section from your library
- Score against the funder's rubric
- Submission-ready .docx
- 4 full runs a month
Premium
$219 per month
For a team writing ten or more applications a year.
- Everything in Core
- 12 full runs a month
- Saved fact library across applications
- Outcome tracking and win rate
- Post-award progress reports
Enterprise
Let's talk
For larger NGOs, multi-program offices and consultancies.
- Shared run pool for your team
- Multiple client organizations
- SSO and onboarding help
- Partner terms for consultants
Rubrically is free while in beta — the plans above are what it will cost at launch.
Start with the notice
already on your desk.
It takes a minute, it costs nothing, and you’ll know exactly what that funder is asking for before you commit another hour to it.