We quote the solicitation.
If the sentence a requirement came from can't be pointed to, it doesn't go in your matrix. An unstated page limit stays blank rather than becoming a plausible-looking guess that costs you the submission.
For nonprofits and the people who write for them
Upload the solicitation on your desk and you have the checklist a reviewer would build from it, in a minute, free. From there Rubrically drafts in your own words and scores the draft the way the panel will, so the week goes to the work only your team can do.
Free to start · no card, no setup · your documents never train a model

| ID | Category | What it asks for | Obligation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-04 | Eligibility | 501(c)(3) with a physical office in the service area | shall | §A.1 |
| R-09 | Format | Project narrative not to exceed 12 pages, single spaced | shall | 12 pp |
| R-11 | Attachment | Current IRS determination letter | must | §D |
| R-17 | Criterion | Evaluation and sustainability plan | scored | 15 pts |
| R-18 | Deadline | Submission closes 5:00 PM local time | must | §B |
An example of the shape of the artifact. No funder, organization or award is named anywhere on this page.
In Your Words
Drafts are built from your documents, so the voice stays yours.
Nothing Invented
If the solicitation doesn't say it, the field stays blank and you're asked.
Always Cited
Every requirement shows the sentence it came from.
Free to Start
Reading a solicitation honestly costs you nothing.
How It Works
Six steps, one place, and the same set of true facts about your organization carrying the whole way through.
Upload the solicitation. Every shall, must, attachment, page limit, deadline and scored criterion becomes a row you can check off, each one carrying the sentence it came from.
Eligibility gates, open requirements, the attachment checklist, and where the points sit. It updates the moment you mark something done.
Add your past proposals and annual report once. Rubrically drafts each section from your own words and asks you for anything it can't find there.
Your draft, read against the funder's own rubric before you send it. Criterion by criterion, with the sentence from your draft that earns each one.
A submission-ready .docx in the order the solicitation asks for, with anything still unfinished marked in the file where you'll see it.
When the money lands, the same fact base writes your progress reports: what you promised, against what your own data shows.
Before you send it
Rubrically reads your draft the way the review panel will, against the scored criteria from that solicitation, and shows you what isn’t answered yet while there’s still time. Every claim that something is covered quotes the sentence in your draft that covers it.
Try It on a Draft →Points are the weights the solicitation published, never an estimate of them.

Our Promise
Your name goes on this application. A number Rubrically invented would be a number you signed for, so the whole thing is built to refuse.
If the sentence a requirement came from can't be pointed to, it doesn't go in your matrix. An unstated page limit stays blank rather than becoming a plausible-looking guess that costs you the submission.
The drafter may only say something about your organization if your own documents say it first. Anything else comes back as a highlighted blank for you to fill, and a check flags any number it can't find in your files.
No silent autofill, no confident filler. If something is missing you'll see exactly what and exactly where, while there's still time to do something about it.
Who It’s For
The person who knows your programs stays in charge. Rubrically gives them their week back.
Where the grants lead is also the events lead, and Friday's deadline is competing with everything else on the desk.
A dozen funders a year, program staff who aren't writers, and a boilerplate library living in six different folders.
Carrying five to twenty clients, billing by the proposal, and losing hours to a blank page that a checklist could have filled.

Pricing
Understanding what a funder is asking for belongs in front of any paywall. Drafting, scoring and assembly are the paid part.
$0 always
See what a solicitation asks for, before you commit a week to it.
$89 per month
For a solo grants lead running a steady pipeline.
$219 per month
For a team writing ten or more applications a year.
Let's talk
For larger NGOs, multi-program offices and consultancies.
Rubrically is free while in beta. The plans above are what it will cost at launch.
It takes a minute and costs nothing, and you’ll know exactly what that funder is asking for before you commit another hour to it.